2010 Elections, Political News

Whiskey tango foxtrot? From Bob Woodward’s new book : Woodward’s book portrays Obama and the White House as barraged by warnings about the threat of terrorist attacks on U.S. soil and confronted with the difficulty in preventing them. During an interview with Woodward in July, the president said, “We can absorb a terrorist attack. We’ll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever . . . we absorbed it and we are stronger.” For the sake of argument I’ll play devil’s advocate for a moment. I get what he’s saying: he’s saying essentially “ let me be clear , we’ll do whatever we can to prevent another 9/11 but worst case scenario, if another one were to happen, we would recover, just as we recovered from 9/11. Whatever kills you doesn’t make you stronger!” And then Kayne would come out singing his bastardized Daft Punk track and boo-yah , another party at the White House. This isn’t the biggest capslock OMG moment for me, from advance excerpts of the book , it seems as though Obama is committing the same faux-pas liberals allege that Bush committed in not listening to his generals. That is a bigger problem, especially coupled with the admin ‘s inability to acknowledge radical Islam as the fuel for terrorism . Are we doing everything to keep America safe? We can’t even acknowledge the enemy’s motivation. Filed under: Democrats , Obamanation , War on terror

Read more:
Obama: “We Can Absorb a Terrorist Attack”

Claws out! France’s first lady Carla Bruni alleges in her new tell-all book that Michelle Obama thinks that her job as America’s first lady is “hell.” Michelle Obama thinks being America’s First Lady is ‘hell’, Carla Bruni reveals today in a wildly indiscreet new book. Miss Bruni reveals that Mrs Obama replied when asked about her position as the U.S. president’s wife: ‘Don’t ask! It’s hell. I can’t stand it!’ Details of the private conversation, which took place at the White House during an official visit by Nicolas Sarkozy last March, emerged in Carla And The Ambitious, a book written in collaboration with Miss Bruni. Perhaps she’s jealous of Mrs. Obama’s incessant vacations while the country writhes in economic turmoil? If what Bruni alleges is true, of course Mrs. Obama would hate the job because the glitz has worn off now that her husband’s approval ratings are in a death spiral. Until now I hadn’t formed an opinion of Ms. Bruni-Sarkozy, but now I find her to be as loose with her discretion as she was with her body back when she was younger and not resigned to kitten heels because stilettos were ill fitting of a woman her age – even if I share her implied shock of such an admission from the First Lady. The swipe at the mother of Mr. Sarkozy’s children is embarrassingly tacky as well, but nothing shocks me from a woman willing to humble the status of the French first lady by putting out a comical little folk album. Relatedly, remember how we were told that if Obama was elected he’d win prom queen of the world and Europa would respect us again? Not so much? Filed under: Foreign gov't , Obamanation

Link:
Carla Bruni vs. Michelle Obama

As listener Rob snorted of the lack of muscle, “Right. This will scare them.” Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu said requests by Arizona law enforcement personnel and Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) for 3,000 National Guard troops along the state’s border with Mexico have been answered so far with 1 percent of that number deployed there this week. “We have a whopping 30 [National Guard troops] this week that are showing up,” Babeu told CNSNews.com. “It’s less than a half-hearted measure designed to fail.” But the federal Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has placed 15 signs along a 60-mile stretch of Interstate 8 that links San Diego with Phoenix and Tucson warning travelers of drug cartels and human trafficking operations. “DANGER – PUBLIC WARNING, TRAVEL NOT RECOMMENDED,” read the signs placed along Interstate 8. “Visitors May Encounter Armed Criminals and Smuggling Vehicles Traveling at High Rates of Speed. Stay Away From Trash, Clothing, Backpacks, and Abandoned Vehicles.” “BLM Encourages Visitors To Use Public Land North of Interstate 8,” the signs say. A handful of signs and 20 National Guard troops! FTW! I’m trying to figure out why so few of the initial National Guard request were sent. It’s within the governor’s jurisdiction to call out the Guard (i.e. when Bush was criticized for not getting the National Guard in LA after Katrina when really, it was the gov’s lawful responsibility to do so and had Bush superseded this some would have made it a states’ rights battle); by all accounts Gov. Brewer made the request for the Guard but why so few sent? It would seem that the hold-up isn’t with her authority, but rather perhaps with the Defense Department. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced in July that the deployment would commence Aug. 1, but National Guard officials later said that date was meant only to reflect when troops would begin training. In March 2009, Brewer wrote to the Defense Department requesting 250 additional soldiers for Arizona’s Joint Counter Narco-Terrorism Task Force, which already uses National Guard personnel. The plan of which Sheriff Babeu is critical : About 30 troops will start their jobs on the border Monday, and waves of more troops will be deploying every Monday until all 532 are expected to be on the Arizona border by the end of September. In May, Obama ordered 1,200 National Guard troops to boost security along the border. Brewer has been a sharp critic of the National Guard deployment, saying the troops aren’t enough and that Obama should have sent 6,000 along the border, half of them to Arizona. But in March 2009, Brewer wrote Defense Secretary Robert Gates asking for 250 National Guard troops, less than half the amount now being sent. I have to say, given the current state of things near the border , I agree with Gov. Brewer and Sheriff Babeu. The Department of Defense needs to get serious about border security. Too little only exacerbates the problem and sends worse than a weak message to those placing bounties on the heads of US law enforcement. Filed under: Immigration , Obamanation

Continued here:
Arizona: Only 1% of Border Security Needs Met

As if you need any more proof that union bosses exploit middle class workers and cop-opt their organizations to be nothing more than accessories to a political party, behold : Union leaders will unleash a concerted attack against Republican candidates and their “right-wing agenda” beginning this Labor Day weekend as they rally to stem expected Democratic losses in November’s midterm elections. Mr. Trumka said the federation will play roles in more than 400 races nationwide, promoting its election agenda with a “massive mobilization” in 26 states. It will focus on 70 House races as well as Senate, gubernatorial and state legislative contests. If unions are worried about jobs, perhaps they should stop supporting party policies that lead to job destruction – or lack of construction … jobs , that is. Filed under: Democrats , Obamanation , Socialists , unions

Originally posted here:
Unions Prep to Carry Water for Dems

From the US Report : Stone pegged this president perfectly even before he was elected. In October, 2008, Stone explained what would come of hope, change and politics: “The downside of yes, we can is the expectations of [Obama’s] voters—I want it now…Two years from now, nothing will change. There’s nothing new about this guy, except he’ll have warmed up to his Palestinian friends by then.” Stone’s analysis was, as usual, spot on. Those ‘Palestinian friends’ of course are all for the mosque. The NY Post reported Mahmoud al-Zahar,  Hamas’ cofounder and current chief, said, “Islam is controlling every source of our life as regard to marriage, divorce, our commercial relationships.” No word on how that approach figures in the US Constitution. For the neophytes: who is Stone ? Filed under: Obamanation

The rest is here:
Dana Show Contributor Roger Stone Calls It on Obama

From the US Report : Stone pegged this president perfectly even before he was elected. In October, 2008, Stone explained what would come of hope, change and politics: “The downside of yes, we can is the expectations of [Obama’s] voters—I want it now…Two years from now, nothing will change. There’s nothing new about this guy, except he’ll have warmed up to his Palestinian friends by then.” Stone’s analysis was, as usual, spot on. Those ‘Palestinian friends’ of course are all for the mosque. The NY Post reported Mahmoud al-Zahar,  Hamas’ cofounder and current chief, said, “Islam is controlling every source of our life as regard to marriage, divorce, our commercial relationships.” No word on how that approach figures in the US Constitution. For the neophytes: who is Stone ? Filed under: Obamanation

See the article here:
Dana Show Contributor Roger Stone Calls It on Obama

The NRSC hits home with a new ad: Via Filed under: Definitive Viewing , Obamanation , Video

Read more:
Who’s the Fringe Again?

The NRSC hits home with a new ad: Via Filed under: Definitive Viewing , Obamanation , Video

Original post:
Who’s the Fringe Again?

This can’t be good for Democrats rolling into midterms. Maybe that’s why they’re being encouraged not to mention it . Support for repeal of the health care reform bill is at its highest level in over a month, while the number of voters who believe repeal will be good for the economy has reached a new high. The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of Likely Voters shows that 60% at least somewhat favor repeal of the health care reform law, while 36% oppose repeal. Those numbers include 50% who Strongly Favor repeal and 26% who Strongly Oppose it. Filed under: Democrats , Election 2010 , Healthcare , Obamanation , Polls , Socialists

Read more:
Majority of Americans Want Health Control Law Repealed

The latest Rasmussen poll will leave Democrats digging deep in their depleted bag of tricks for some way around this: A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 48% of Likely U.S. Voters now think Obama’s policies are to blame for the continuing bad economy, up three points from  last month . Forty-seven percent (47%) say the recession that began under Bush is at fault. Filed under: Democrats , Economics , Obamanation

Go here to see the original:
Blame Bush? Not Anymore